Doing Your Masters Dissertation Review

Doing Your Masters Dissertation Review

Table of Contents

Do you remember the time we all fretted about writing our master’s dissertations? It’s a universal experience for anyone who’s trudged through the murky swampland known as graduate school. For those of us lost in the academic abyss, “Doing Your Masters Dissertation Paperback – 16 December 2004” by Chris Hart is like a lifejacket. Ah yes, this book has become our unlikely companion, our savior, and in some moments, our tormentor. Let’s break it down, shall we?

Doing Your Masters Dissertation     Paperback – 16 December 2004

See the Doing Your Masters Dissertation     Paperback – 16 December 2004 in detail.

Why We Picked Up This Book

We all know that feeling of existential dread when faced with the task of completing a dissertation. Questions go unanswered, research feels daunting, and deadlines seem merciless. In our quest for sanity, this book appeared as a beacon of hope.

Doing Your Masters Dissertation Paperback – 16 December 2004

AED216.64   Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).

A Deeper Look into Chris Hart’s Approach

In our journey through graduate school, we quickly realized the art of writing a dissertation isn’t just about intellectual brilliance. It’s a meticulously regimented dance, a balancing act of systematic research, insightful analysis, and disciplined writing. Chris Hart, with his experience and knack for pedagogical clarity, encapsulates this process in a digestible format.

Here’s a little table for quick insight:

Aspect Details
Author Chris Hart
Publication Date 16 December 2004
Format Paperback
Total Pages 360
Target Audience Master’s Students
Focus Area Dissertation Writing and Research

The Structure and Layout

Do you remember feeling inundated with information? Hart anticipates this and structures his book with a certain elegance, akin to organizing a cluttered workspace. Every chapter flows logically with practical steps. It’s like a road map but less annoying because it doesn’t incessantly reroute us.

Kickstarting Our Dissertation: The Initial Stages

In the early chapters, Hart provides foundational steps – selecting a topic, framing a research question, and conducting a literature review. We’ve all had that moment of blank-page-syndrome, right? Chris Hart eases us out of that paralysis with gentle encouragement and no-nonsense advice.

The Art of Literature Review

We groaned when Hart emphasized the literature review, but his method made it less grueling. He presents techniques for summarizing sources and integrating them into our research narrative. Organizing this information felt like taming a wild beast, but we managed it, thanks to Hart.

Methodological Guideposts: Our Compass

Chris Hart’s clarity on research methodology deserves a whole section of praise. From qualitative to quantitative approaches, he details each method’s applicability and advantages. It’s like he understands our hesitation and reassures us like a kind, academically-inclined friend.

Data Collection and Analysis

Ah, data collection. Both the joy and bane of our academic journey. This book assisted us in formulating questionnaires, conducting interviews, and systematically analyzing data. Hart’s guidance ensured we didn’t just collect data; we made sense of it.

Click to view the Doing Your Masters Dissertation     Paperback – 16 December 2004.

Practical Tools and Techniques

One of Hart’s key strengths lies in the practical tools he offers. For instance, his suggestions on time management, structuring arguments, and maintaining motivation are akin to having a pep talk with an experienced mentor. And let’s face it, we all need that.

Time Management Tips That Actually Work

Let’s be honest: we’ve all struggled to juggle our workloads. Hart presents doable strategies for creating realistic schedules and setting manageable goals. It felt like we had our own personal project manager keeping us on track.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Graduate life is fraught with cautionary tales of unfinished dissertations and eternal studentship. Hart addresses these fears, outlining the common pitfalls and how to steer clear of them. His advice is direct and relatable, like a seasoned marathon runner warning us about that tricky last mile.

Keeping The Procrastination Monster at Bay

A particularly relatable section is about managing procrastination. Hart offers insights into why we procrastinate and how to tackle it. It’s like he sees right through our excuses and offers strategies that work in the real world.

Reflections on Personal Experiences

Our personal little vignettes make this journey resonate. That time we stayed up late, huddled over the book, feeling the tingle of inspiration. Or when Hart’s tips were just the push we needed to transform a stagnant draft into something commendable.

Connecting Theory with Practice

Hart excels in connecting theory with practical application. Each piece of advice feels grounded in real-world academia, making it easier for us to implement his techniques into our own work seamlessly.

The Lifeline to Sanity and Success

There were dark days when we questioned our decision to embark on this academic pursuit. Hart’s book served as a lifeline, reminding us that feeling overwhelmed is just a part of the process. It was like having a seasoned friend to guide us through the academic tempest.

Light Moments Amidst Serious Discourse

Despite the occasional heavy-handedness, Hart manages to infuse light-hearted advice, making the narrative less daunting. We appreciated those moments when the book decided to take a breath and inject a little humor or relief. It reminded us that after all, we’re still human.

Doing Your Masters Dissertation     Paperback – 16 December 2004

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In retrospective contemplation, “Doing Your Masters Dissertation Paperback – 16 December 2004” by Chris Hart stands as an indispensable ally. For those of us who have navigated the labyrinth of dissertation writing, this tome resonates with warmth, practicality, and a deep understanding of the academic journey. It felt like an invisible hand guiding us through treacherous waters to the welcoming shore of completion.

When the panic sets in, remember we have a resource in Chris Hart’s book. It’s more than a manual; it’s a companion that speaks to our academic struggles and triumphs. It doesn’t just tell us what to do; it shows us how to do it.

And so, as we flip through its dog-eared pages, scattering notes and penciled comments, we can’t help but feel a profound sense of gratitude. This book didn’t just prepare us to write a dissertation; it equipped us to embrace the challenge with a sense of purpose and determination. Now, armed with Hart’s wisdom, our dissertations stand not as a monument of suffering, but as a testament to our perseverance.

That’s a win in our book.

See the Doing Your Masters Dissertation     Paperback – 16 December 2004 in detail.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Want to keep up with our blog?

Get our most valuable tips right inside your inbox, once per month!

Related Posts

University Essentials
Artificial Intelligence

About Me

With 25 years of experience in healthcare IT implementation, Emmanuel began his career at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, working as an assistant manager for a billing system implementation. Over the years, he has explored various aspects of the healthcare IT domain, successfully implementing several laboratory information systems and electronic medical record (EMR) systems, such as Cerner Millennium and Epic EMR.

In 2005, Emmanuel shifted his focus to public health, working on bio-surveillance implementation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). He contributed to the BioSense Data Provisioning Project and performed extensive analysis of HL7 messages in hospitals and healthcare facilities. Additionally, Emmanuel requirements analysis for the CDC BioSense Analysis, Visualization and Reporting (AVR) project and played a key role in publishing the Situational Awareness updates to the BioSense System Requirements Specification (SRS).

Over the past 11 years, Emmanuel has worked in the Middle East, implementing the Epic EMR system at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi. As a multidisciplinary team member, he has taken on various roles, including SCRUM Master, Project Manager, Integration Engineer, and Platform Engineer. Concurrently working as an adjunct university faculty member, teaching graduate-level courses in Systems Life Cycle and undergraduate courses in Health Information Systems

From a technological standpoint, Emmanuel has designed, installed, and implemented complete hospital integration systems using Rhapsody Integration Engine, MS SQL Server, and Public Health Information Networks Messaging System (PHINMS). He has also developed over 10,000 interfaces some of which coded in Java and JavaScript.

In 2019, Emmanuel expanded his skill set and entered the field of digital marketing, quickly becoming a proficient Digital Marketing Strategist. He has since helped numerous clients develop robust digital marketing strategies for their businesses. His expertise encompasses Social Media Marketing, On-page and Off-page SEO, Google Ads, and Google Analytics. Additionally, he and a team have managed clients’ website development projects, ensuring that each site is optimized for SEO, further enhancing their online presence and performance.

Alongside their digital marketing expertise, Emmanuel has delved into the world of Affiliate Marketing, where Emmanuel and his team successfully managed and executed campaigns for a variety of clients. By identifying the right products and services to promote, Emmanuel and his team helped clients generate passive income streams and increase their overall revenue.

Their approach to Affiliate Marketing involves creating valuable content that educates and engages the target audience, while strategically incorporating affiliate links. Emmanuel and his team have experience working with multiple affiliate networks and platforms, ensuring optimal tracking and reporting of performance metrics. By staying up to date with the latest trends and best practices, Emmanuel and his team have been able to optimize affiliate campaigns for maximum results, fostering long-term partnerships and sustainable growth for their clients.

As an accomplished professional, Emmanuel holds dual Bachelor of Arts degrees in Linguistics and English, a Master of Science in Health Information Systems from the University of Pittsburgh, and a Ph.D. in Information Systems from Nova Southeastern University.

My Teaching History

Professor Bazile is a dedicated technology instructor and Adjunct Faculty professor, who began his teaching career in April 2000 at the Business Career Institute in Las Vegas, Nevada.

In 2001, he expanded his expertise by training nurses in the use of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) systems. His experience in both technology and healthcare led to his appointment as an Adjunct Faculty professor at the University of Phoenix in May 2008, where he has taught several graduate-level information technology and healthcare information systems courses.

Dr. Bazile has also developed an HL7 course, which he has taught at various healthcare facilities, drawing from his own book, “HL7: Introductory and Advanced Concepts,” currently available on Amazon. With a passion for teaching and a commitment to ensuring students get the most out of each course he teaches, Dr. Bazile is a valuable asset to both his students and the institutions he serves.

My Teaching Philosophy

My teaching philosophy as an Information Systems professor in healthcare is built on the concept that education should equip students to be confident and capable problem solvers who are prepared to traverse the complicated and ever-changing landscape of Healthcare IT.

In order to accomplish this, I prioritize the creation of a dynamic and engaging learning environment that encourages students to engage with course material and with one another. This involves employing a range of teaching approaches, such as lectures, seminars, and hands-on activities, to ensure that students learn in the manner that best matches their learning style.

I believe the reason we have Information Systems as a discipline is to allow students to apply technology to solve real world problems. If that is the case, both undergraduate and graduate students have to be challenged to incorporate their core academic courses with their matriculated subjects. As such, it is important that students enter their Junior and Senior years with a strong command of the core courses such as Programming, databases, networks, hardware and software, as they serve as the foundation upon which real-world solutions will be built.

I also believe in the importance of incorporating real-world examples and case studies into my courses, as this helps to connect abstract concepts to practical applications. Additionally, I encourage students to apply what they are learning to their own personal and professional goals, as this helps to make the material more meaningful and relevant to their lives.

I strive to foster a positive and supportive learning environment where all students feel comfortable asking questions and participating in class discussions. I believe that this is key to fostering a sense of community and ensuring that all students have the opportunity to succeed.

I have also taught online courses. I have found in an asynchronous learning environment it can be difficult to apply the Peer Teaching or Experiential Learning Pedagogical Approaches. However, I have found the Discovery Learning approach to works quite well. Along with a boost to students’ self-confidence, Discovery Learning in an online environment allows students to synthesize information, expand on existing concepts on their own, while experiencing a positive outcome through trial and error.

Ultimately, my mission as an educator, and a Healthcare IT Information Systems professor is to provide students with the knowledge, skills, and confidence they need to thrive and succeed in their careers and to be technological leaders. By creating a positive and supportive learning environment, incorporating real-world examples and case studies, and encouraging students to apply what they are learning to their own objectives; my hope is to inspire and empower all students to achieve their full potential.

Population Size:

A total of 310 responses were originally received. Any response containing missing data due to unclicked radio buttons or unchecked checkboxes were first reviewed, and, if justified, were omitted from analysis. For surveys with missing data, a total of 18 responses were removed. In order to address any issues with response-set, the data was downloaded into Microsoft Access and queries ran to identify responses that contained the same values for each question. A total of 16 responses were found to be qualified for removal. Another 18 were identified as outliers and removed leaving a total of 258 responses for the study analysis.

In order to assess multivariate outliers, the Mahalanobis distances were calculated and plotted against their corresponding Chi-Square distribution percentiles (Schmidt & Hunter, 2003). The resulting scatterplot is similar to a univariate normal Q-Q plot, where deviations from a straight line show evidence of non-normality. The data showed indications of moderate deviations from multivariate normality, as indicated by the concavity of the data points. There were no additional multivariate outliers or missing values in the data after the removal of 52 responses.

Descriptive Statistics

Frequencies and percentages were conducted for the demographics indicators, while means and standard deviations were calculated for the continuous indicators. For gender, there were 151 females (59%) and 107 males (41%) in the sample. For ethnicity, most participants were Caucasian (119, 46%), followed by African American (56, 22%). The two most populous education levels were Bachelor’s (90, 35%) and Master’s (62, 22%). The biggest proportion of the sample by age group was the 35-44 age group (101, 39%) followed by the 45-54 age group (59, 23%).

Analysis:

Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Composite Reliability

A CFA was conducted along with a reliability analysis to assess construct validity. Examination of modification indices and factor loadings indicated that CSE1, CSE5, CSE7, PC5, ATE1, ATE6, ATE8, PP5, and PP6 were all causing significant problems with the model parameters. The results of the last iteration of the CFA performed in R showed significantly improved fit, although still poor overall (χ2(545) = 2125.61, p < .001, CFI = 0.82, TLI = 0.81, RMSEA = 0.11). The high degrees of freedom indicate that a very large number of parameters are being estimated in this model.

Composite Reliability

For the full model, each construct had excellent reliability. The ATE latent construct had a composite reliability value of 0.89. The ORC construct had a composite reliability value of 0.94. The CSE latent construct had a composite reliability value of 0.85 and PC had a composite reliability value of 0.95. For PP and RES, the composite reliability scores were 0.80 and 0.96 respectively. These values indicate that the loadings for each construct were all directionally similar, and that the items in each construct show a high degree of consistency.

Cronbach’s Alpha

Cronbach’s alpha values were calculated for the items in each construct. The alphas for PC (α = 0.90), AXY (α = 0.94), and RES (α = 0.94) indicated excellent reliability. The alphas for CSE (α = 0.80), ATE (α = 0.88), and PP (α = 0.83) all showed good reliability. These values confirm the results of the composite reliability tests, and reiterate the high degree of reliability within each latent construct.

Partial Least Squares – Structural Equation Modeling

A partial least squares- structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was conducted to determine how well the data fit the proposed model, and discern whether significant relationships existed between the independent and dependent constructs. The full model showed AVE values of 0.53 for ATE, 0.69 for AXY, 0.44 for CSE, .72 for PC, .35 for PP, and 0.81 for RES. The high values for AXY, PC, and RES indicate that the amount of variance accounted for in the manifest variables is sufficiently high. The values for ATE, CSE, and PP indicate that some of the variance in the manifest variables is left unexplained.

Structural Model

Once the measurement model had been tested for model specification, the structural model was tested to determine if ATE, AXY, CSE, PC, and PP had a significant effect on RES. A path weighted model was calculated using 10,000 bootstrap samples in R. The results showed a pseudo R-squared value of 0.78. This indicates that approximately 78% of the variance in RES is explainable by the collective effects of CSE, PC, ATE, PP, and AXY.

Further examination of the effects indicated that AXY had a highly significant effect on RES (= 0.87, < .001). This indicates that a standard deviation increase in AXY increases the expected value of RES by 0.87 standard deviations. CSE did not have a significant effect on RES (= 0.02, = .423). Additionally, CSE (= 0.02, = .423), PC (= 0.05, = .334), ATE (= 0.00, = .983), and PP (= 0.03, = .407) did not have significant effects on RES. Table 11 outlines the results of the path estimates.

Correlation Analyses

Both Pearson and Spearman correlations were calculated on the composite scores. The results of the Pearson correlations indicated that CSE was significantly correlated AXY (= 0.22, < .001) and RES (= 0.21, < .001). The results also indicated that PC was significantly correlated with ATE (= -0.79, < .001), AXY (= 0.18, < .001), and RES (= 0.20, < .001). ATE was significantly correlated with AXY (= -0.19, < .001) and RES (= -0.19, < .001). AXY was significantly correlated with RES (= 0.85, < .001).

ANCOVA Analyses

An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to determine if a significant relationship existed between the AXY, PP, CSE, PC, ATE scores and RES controlling for Gender, Age, Ethnicity, Education, and Specialty. The overall model was found to be significant (F(63,194) = 53.39, < .001), with an R2 value of .95, indicating that 95% of the variance in RES was explained by the collective effect of the independent variables and covariates.

Since the overall model was found to be significant, the model’s covariates were assessed. The AXY (F(10,194) = 262.20, < .001), ATE (F(7,194) = 2.20, = .036), Years computers (F(1,194) = 5.71, = .018), and PC (F(12,194) = 2.00, = .026) scores were found to be significant, indicating that a significant amount of variance in RES is explained by AXY, ATE, and PC.

A path diagram depicting the results of the structural model.

Results

This research investigated Computer Self-Efficacy (CSE), Perceived Complexity (PC), Attitudes toward EMR Systems (ATE), Peer Pressure (PP), and Anxiety (AXY) to determine whether these constructs as individuals, or as a group, or coupled together with some other factors could significantly explain resistance to EMR systems. Quantitative examination of self-reported survey results was performed to understand the strength and significance of the relationships, while these relationships were investigated to test the strength of model fit.

the regression paths of the structural model were examined to test the hypotheses. Significance was determined using an alpha level of .05. The model had an overall R2 value of 0.78. This indicates that approximately 78% of the variability in RES can be accounted for by CSE, PC, ATE, PP, and AXY. Since the overall model was significant, the individual coefficients can be interpreted. Some of the hypotheses were supported by the results of this study, and some were rejected. The construction of a data model of the relationships in this study could not meet thresholds that would be evidence of a good fit of the relationships identified in the study.

The fifth hypotheses tested the influence of AXY on resistance to EMR systems. AXY was expressed to be significantly related to resistance (r=.87, p<.001). This finding supports the hypothesis that anxiety with the EMR system will lead to medical care professionals rejecting use of the system. Unlike the findings of the first four hypotheses, the findings of the current study support previous research. Angst and Agarwal (2009) indicated that AXY is a factor which is significantly related to the problem of EMR system resistance. Based on the empirical findings of previous research, the present research and conceptual propositions and conclusions in previously written scholarly articles, there is a great deal of support for the finding that AXY is significantly influenced by EMR resistance.

The findings of this research do not support all findings by previous researchers, and there are multiple relationships which had been established as being significant that were identified as being insignificant in the current research. Generally, because of the inconsistency of previous findings and the current study there may be elements related to the sample examined or other contextual factors which may contribute to the inconsistency that exists. Ultimately, it is suggested that there be further research done on the problem of resistance to EMR system use.

Ultimately the findings support a new take on the problem of EMR system resistance that may contribute to the ways in which scholars investigate the problem of EMR resistance in general. This may also help with the way practitioners approach EMR systems, and articulate value of the systems to medical professionals investing record-keeping systems in the workplace.